Friday, November 4, 2011

Season Tickets and Sunk Cost

This is an interesting study I came across reading "Sway" by Ori and Rom Brafman. It's a 1985 paper on sunk cost by Hal Arkes and Catherine Blumer. In it, they study the behavior of people who come to a university box office to purchase season tickets. They offer the people arbitrary discounts, and then see who comes more often. The result? The subscribers who paid MORE attended more performances.

Here's a link to an excerpt from the article: http://books.google.com/books?id=vKmCjtm0l48C&lpg=PA97&ots=SeMIT47Tbj&lr&pg=PA99#v=onepage&q&f=true

The full article is available for purchase, but the relevant part about the subscribers is excerpted in the link.

The full article citation is "The Psychology of Sunk Cost" by Hal Arkes and Catherine Blumer.

I'm interested to comb through the usage rates of my own subscribers to see if there's a correlation - although, given that the subscribers chooses the price point rather than the researchers (as in the above-cited study) I wouldn't necessarily predict the same behavior. If anyone has looked at the usage rates of their season packages, I'd be interested to know whether the usage rates vary with the price points.

Friday, October 28, 2011

I'd watch that again

We just did an audience survey that got a decent response. One of the questions was: "which of the shows that you saw this year would (did) you see more than once?"

We did two musicals and three plays. In regards to the question, the musicals were a heavy winner. I'd like to ask some more questions about it in future surveys - it confirms something that I suspected already - especially in the case of sell-out musicals: that a lot of the traffic comes from repeats, often bringing friends or relations to share the experience.

Does this resonate with anyone? Has anyone analyzed attendance data for this kind of pattern?